Publications and Presentations

Minnesota Public Health Research to Action Network

2013
Mar. Monitoring QI Maturity of Public Health Organizations and Systems in Minnesota: Promising Early Findings and Suggested Next Steps
Mar. Analysis of Local Health Department Factors that Accelerate Population-Based Intervention Implementation and Support Success
Jan. Multi-network Practice and Outcome Variation Examination (MPROVE) Study
2012
Oct. Financing Local Public Health Services in Minnesota:
Trends in Local Tax Levy Expenditures
May Quality Improvement Culture in Minnesota Health Departments: Local Health Departments,
2011
Nov. Quality Improvement Culture in Minnesota Health Departments: Minnesota Department of Health
Oct. Factors Associated with Local Public Health Department Performance: Literature Review and Executive Summary
May Authority and Positioning of Minnesota CHS Administrators and Local Health Directors
Mar. Governance and Organization of Local Public Health Services
in Minnesota

 
March 2013

Monitoring QI Maturity of Public Health Organizations and Systems in Minnesota: Promising Early Findings and Suggested Next Steps

Published in Frontiers in Public Health Services & Systems Research

Public health departments and systems are increasing investments in quality improvement. This paper presents methods used to identify a select number of items from a previously validated QI Maturity Tool as the basis for calculating organizational and system-level QI maturity scores that could be followed over time. Findings suggest that the abbreviated tool measures variation in QI maturity across LHDs, and differences in scores among divisions within a state health department. Minnesota has incorporated the abbreviated tool into an annual reporting system for the MN Local Public Health Act, thereby enabling stakeholders to monitor a system median score and distribution of scores every year. Such information will be used by state and local partners to identify opportunities for system-wide improvements.

Go to this Publication

< Return to the top of the page

March 2013

Analysis of Local Health Department Factors that Accelerate Population-Based Intervention Implementation and Support Success

Presented at the March 2013 SCHSAC Meeting.

Download this Presentation

< Return to the top of the page

January 2013

Multi-network Practice and Outcome Variation Examination (MPROVE) Study

The Multi-network Practice and Outcome Variation Examination (MPROVE) Study is a national study with participation from seven public health practice-based research networks (PBRNs), with leadership from the PBRN National Coordinating Center. Minnesota is collaborating to develop and test a package of local public health service measures.

Download this Brief

Related Documents

< Return to the top of the page

 
October 2012

Financing Local Public Health Services in Minnesota:
Trends in Local Tax Levy Expenditures

State and local leaders in public health and health care have long called for adequate, stable and flexible funding for local public health services in Minnesota. A recent report by the Institute of Medicine underscores urgency around public health financing nationwide. Emerging research increasingly supports the central role of funding in the performance of public health departments as well as population health outcomes.

When adjusted for inflation, Minnesota’s per capita local tax levy increased nearly 16 percent during the 5-year period 2006-2010. Conversely, per capita local tax levy expenditures decreased 2.4 percent across Minnesota local health departments.

Download This Publication

< Return to the top of the page

 
May 2012

Local Health Departments

From 2009-2011, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation monitored the organizational QI culture in the 16 states that participated in the Multi-States Learning Collaborative. This brief highlights findings related to organizational culture, quality improvement and readiness for accreditation.

Download Issue Briefs

< Return to the top of the page

November 2011

Minnesota Department of Health

A department-wide survey relating to quality improvement (QI) capacity and organizational culture was fielded to all employees at the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) in June 2011. This survey asked questions related to: QI culture and capacity; employee empowerment; cultural competency; and readiness for national, voluntary accreditation. The survey was designed to serve as a baseline for maturity of QI within the department, as well as identify specific areas in which MDH could strengthen its activities around QI. In addition, questions related to organizational culture and employee empowerment provide opportunities to examine the work culture at MDH and how employees might be supported in their work.

Download Issue Briefs

< Return to the top of the page

October 2011

Factors Associated with Local Public Health Department Performance: Literature Review

Until recently, most of the public health systems and services research related to local health department (LHD) performance relied on cross-sectional data sources that made it difficult to determine cause and effect of various factors associated with performance.

Two recent studies used longitudinal approaches to study factors related to local health department structure, financing and capacity. These studies were also unique in that they examined those factors with respect to population health outcomes. They found strong associations between LHD spending and staffing with respect to measures of morbidity and mortality.

Overall, the factors most strongly associated with LHD performance included: population size served, expenditures, funding, staffing, and organizational structure. Weaker associations were found with Director qualifications, partnerships, community characteristics and organizational leadership. Research is needed related to newly merged organizations, such as health departments joining with human services agencies, and how that has affected LHD performance.

Executive Summary

Download Full Issue Brief

< Return to the top of the page

May 2011

Authority and Positioning of Minnesota CHS Administrators and Local Health Directors

Little is known about the extent to which community health service (CHS) administrators and local health directors have key authorities related to budgeting and access to elected officials. Information on authority and organizational positioning is needed to help articulate roles of public health leadership. Issues related to authority and positioning are crucial considerations during succession planning, and when discussing changes to local public health governance and organization.

Minnesota's State Community Health Services Advisory Committee (SCHSAC) has begun to more fully articulate the expected authorities of a CHS administrator, in order to focus attention on this issue, motivate discussion and change where needed, and help assure that these authorities endure periodic changes to local public health governance and organizational structures.

This brief will examine the authorities of CHS administrators in relation to their community health boards (CHBs), and the authorities of local health directors in relation to their county boards or city councils.

Download Issue Brief

< Return to the top of the page

March 2011

Governance and Organization of Local Public Health Services in Minnesota

Between May 2009 and May 2010, 28% of county boards, and 28% of community health boards (CHBs) considered, proposed or decided to change their organizational or governance structure.

Almost all attention to organizational structure focused on merging with another department or division of government, and most attention on governance structure addressed adding a jurisdiction to a CHB or organizing under Statute Chapter 402 so that the Human Services Board (HSB) serves as the CHB.

Most local health directors and CHS administrators in organizations affected by potential changes reported having a role with elected officials by providing information, tools, guidance, and/or recommendations.

Some top public health officials expressed satisfaction with current structures, whereas others identified limitations with current structures or concerns about the motivation for changing structures.

Download Issue Brief

< Return to the top of the page