Developmental and Social-Emotional Screening of Young Children (0-6 years of age) in Minnesota
Minnesota Department of Human Services Minnesota Department of Education Minnesota Department of Health

Developmental Indicators for Assessment of Learning – 3rd ed. (DIAL – 3)

Printer-Friendly Version (PDF: 83KB/1 page)

For further information on these criteria, see instrument technical documentation and/or publisher.

Developmental Screening Instrument Profile
General Information
Type of Instrument Observational
Date of Publication 1998
Age Span 3 years – 6 years, 11 months
Available Languages English, Spanish
Reliability Internal reliability = .87
Inter-rater = .90
Test-retest = .84 -.88
Validity Concurrent = .79
Sensitivity 83%
Specificity 86%
Administration Information
Time to administer 20-30 minutes
Time to score 10-15 minutes
Minimum reading level N/A
Minimum scoring skills May be administered and scored by a trained professional or paraprofessional
Ordering Information
Name of Test Developmental Indicators for Assessment of Learning – 3rd ed. (DIAL – 3)
Website Address www.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=PAa13700&Mode=summary
Publisher’s Address Pearson, Attn: Customer Service, 19500 Bulverde Road, San Antonio, TX 78259-3701
Publisher’s Phone 1-800-627-7271
Publisher’s Fax 1-800-232-1223
Publisher’s Email ClinicalCustomerSupport@Pearson.com
Cost Yes, contact publisher
Educational/Training Resources
Manual available Yes
Video available Yes
Training Method Training materials are included with the DIAL-3. An optional training video also is available, which provides an overview of the testing process and demonstrates how to administer the items.
Additional References

Costenbader, V., Rohrer, A.M., & Difonzo, N. (2000). Kindergarten screening: A survey of current practice. Psychology in the School, 37(4), 323-332.

Vincent C. Alfonso, and Michael R. Emmons.  A Critical Review of the Technical Characteristics of Current Preschool Screening Batteries. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 23, No. 2, 111-127 (2005).