Choosing a Pretest Method

There are several ways to pretest your material. Some are quite easy to administer and others more difficult. Choose a method that fits your budget and resources. If you think you don't possibly have the time, budget, or resources to do any pre-testing, think again. At the very least, you could have all your coalition members take a draft of the material and ask two or three people to respond to it. Remember, this is the very least you could do, but it is still very valuable.

Nonparticipatory

Readability Tests

Purpose- To assess reading comprehension skills required to understand print materials
Application- Print Materials
Number of Respondents- None
Resources Required- Readability Formula
15 minutes
Pros- Inexpensive
Quick
Cons- "Rule of Thumb" only/not predictive
Does not account for health terminology
No target audience reaction

Individual: Self-Administered Questionnaires

Purpose- To obtain individual reactions to draft materials
Application- Print or audiovisual materials
Number of Respondents- Enough to see a pattern of response (minimum-20; 100-200 ideal)
Resources Required- List of Respondents Draft materials
Questionnaire Postage (if mailed)
Pros- Inexpensive
Can be anonymous for respondents
Can reach homebound, rural, other difficult to reach groups
Easy and usually quick for respondents
Does not require staff time to interact with respondents (if mailed)
Cons- Response rate may be low (if mailed) May require follow-up
May take long time to receive sufficient responses Respondents self-select (potential bias) Exposure to materials isn't controlled May not be appropriate if audience has
limited writing skills


Individual Interviews (phone or in person)

Purpose- Probe for individual's responses, beliefs, discuss range of issues
Application- Develop messages, potentially motivating strategies
Discuss sensitive issues or complex draft materials
Number of Respondents- Minimum of 10 per type of respondent
Resources Required- List of respondents Discussion guide/Questionnaire
Trained interviewer Telephone or quiet room
Tape recorder
Pros- In-depth responses may differ from first response
Can test sensitive or emotional materials
Can test more complex/longer materials
Can learn more about "hard-to-reach" audiences
Can be used with individuals who have limited reading and writing skills
Cons- Time consuming to conduct/analyze
Expensive and may yield no firmer conclusions or consensus

Central Location Intercept Interviews

A central location intercept interview is an interview conducted with respondents who are stopped at a highly trafficked location, e.g., grocery store, mall, movie theatre, church. Choose a location that is frequented by your target audience.

Purpose- To obtain more quantitative information about materials/messages
Application- Broad range, including concepts, print, audiovisual materials
Number of Respondents- 60-100 per type (helps to establish a pattern of response)
Resources Required- Structured questionnaire Trained Interviewers
Room or other place to interview Tape recorder
Access to mall, school, other location
Pros- Can quickly conduct large number of interviews
Can provide "reliable" information for decision-making
Can test many kinds of materials
Quick to analyze close-ended questions
Cons- Short (10 min.) interviews
Incentive/Persuasion needed for more time
Cannot probe
Cannot deal with sensitive issues
Sample is restricted to individuals at the location
Respondents choose to cooperate and may not be representative

Group: Focus Group Interviews

Purpose-
To obtain in-depth information about beliefs, perceptions, language, interests, concerns
Application- Broad; Concepts, issues, audiovisual or print materials, logos/other artwork
Number of Respondents- 8-12 per group; Minimum 2 groups per type of respondent
Resources Required- Discussion outline Trained moderator
List of respondents Meeting Room
Tape Recorder VCR
Pros- Group interaction and length of discussion can stimulate more in-depth responses
Can discuss concepts prior to materials development
Can gather more opinions at once
Can complete groups and analyses quickly
Can cover multiple topics
Cons- Too few respondents for consensus or decision-making
No individual responses (group influence) unless combined with other methods
Can be expensive
Respondents choose to attend, and may not be typical of the target population



Theater Testing

Purpose- To test audiovisual materials with many respondents at once
Application- Pretest audio or audiovisual materials
Number of Respondents- 60-100 per type (enough to establish a pattern of response)
Resources Required- List of respondents Questionnaire
Large meeting room AV equipment
Pros- Can test with many respondents at once
Large sample may be more productive
Can be inexpensive
Can analyze quickly
Cons-
Few open-ended questions possible
Can require more elaborate preparation
Can be expensive if incentives required

Finding Interviewers

Trained interviewers should be used whenever possible. For focus groups and in-depth interviews, this is essential. If your agency has no experience in focus group studies, you may consider hiring a good, experienced moderator, observing the taping the sessions and using them as training to develop in-house skills. Local advertising agencies may be of assistance in identifying a good moderator. Continuing education courses in interpersonal communication or group interaction also may be useful for staff training or identifying potential interviewers.

For conducting central location interviews, university and college departments of marketing, communications or health education might be able to provide interviewer training and student interviewers. Pretesting a poster or an advertisement is an excellent "real world" project for a faculty member to adopt as a class project. Students in these departments are being trained in research methods, and pretesting can give them a chance to develop their skills.

Source: Making Health Communications Work, NCI


Designing Your Message Main Page

Community Health Promotion Main Page



See also > Center for Health Promotion > Health Promotion and Chronic Disease