Hand Washing Among Public Restroom Users At the Minnesota State Fair

Download PDF version formatted for print:
Hand Washing Among Public Restroom Users At the Minnesota State Fair (PDF: 33KB/5 pages)

by Paul B. Allwood and the Minnesota Food Safety Planning group, Division of Environmental Health

Objectives

An observational study was carried out to collect baseline data and to assess the impact of signs on hand washing among public restroom users. The study was carried out between June 2003 and September 2004 at three large events held on the Minnesota state fairgrounds.

Methods

Discrete observations of individuals were carried out in two male and two female restrooms during the Back-to-the Fifties car show (event 1), the 2003 Minnesota State Fair (event 2), and the 2004 Minnesota State Fair (event 3). The restrooms were similar size, layout, and basic infrastructure. For purposes of the study, the use of soap was considered to be indicative of a “handwash” and use of water without soap was defined as hand rinsing. Average hand washing percentages were calculated for each sex and for youths and adults. Small children accompanied by adults were not observed at any of the three events, and older children (youth) were not observed during the first two events. Hand rinsing was also not tracked during the first two events.

Results

Totals of 400, 378, and 397 individuals entered the study restrooms at events 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Average observed hand washing was 64%, 65%, and 75% among females and 30%, 39%, and 51% among males at events 1, 2, and 3 respectively (Figure 1). Observed hand washing rates among both male and female adults showed an increasing trend during the study; however, the increase was more significant among males (Figure 1).

Graph showing handwashing rates for each event by gender.
Figure 1. Average observed hand washing percentages among adult males and females at the Back-to-the fifties car show (1), the 2003 Minnesota state fair (2), and the 2004 Minnesota state fair (3). All observations were carried out in the same two male and two female restrooms.

Overall, average observed hand washing rates at the 2004 Minnesota State fair were higher for adults than for youths (Figure 2). However, female youths had the highest average observed hand washing rate of the four groups observed (66%), followed by adults males (53%), adult females (50%), and male youths (18%). Hand rinsing was observed at about a three times higher rate in males than in females, while females were more often observed leaving without either hand washing or hand rinsing. Thirty-eight per cent (38%) of observed adult females did not perform hand washing or hand rinsing compared to 22% of female youths, 18% of male youths, and 6% of adult males.


Graph showing handwashing rates among adults and youths.

Figure 2. Comparative hand washing rates among adults and youths at the 2004 Minnesota State Fair. Hand Washing involved the use of soap, while hand rinsing involved use of water without soap.

Conclusions

Gender and age appear to be associated with hand washing among public restroom users. Females were observed washing their hands after restroom use more often than males. In contrast, females were also observed leaving restrooms without even rinsing their hands more often than males. Anatomical differences in male and female genitalia may lead to differences in perception of likely hand contamination after restroom use by males and females. This perhaps explains why more hand washing was observed among females and more hand rinsing among males. Follow-up studies are necessary to assess hand washing after specific restroom activities such as grooming, urination, and defecation. Studies should also be conducted to identify the barriers to proper hand washing among the public. Finally, the increase hand washing after placing hand washing signs in the study restrooms suggests that targeted health education may have a positive effect on hand washing. However, this finding should be confirmed by follow-up studies.

Acknowledgements:

The author expresses his sincere gratitude to members of the Minnesota Food Safety Partnership for their invaluable assistance with data collection.

 

Updated Monday, November 22, 2010 at 11:28AM