Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 2008: DCN - Minnesota Dept. of Health

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 2008

Strains of Staphylococcus aureus that are resistant to methicillin and all available beta-lactam antibiotics are referred to as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Traditional risk factors for health care-associated (HA) MRSA include recent hospitalization or surgery, residence in a long-term care facility, and renal dialysis.

In 1997, MDH began receiving reports of healthy young patients with MRSA infections. These patients had onset of their MRSA infections in the community and appeared to lack the established risk factors for MRSA. Although most of the reported infections were not severe, some resulted in serious illness or death. Strains of MRSA cultured from persons without HA risk factors for MRSA are known as community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA). CA-MRSA is defined as: a positive culture for MRSA from a specimen obtained <48 hours of admission to a hospital in a patient with no history of prior MRSA infection or colonization; no presence of indwelling percutaneous devices or catheters at the time of culture; and no history of hospitalization, surgery, residence in a long-term care facility, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis in the year prior to the positive MRSA culture.

MDH initiated surveillance for CA-MRSA at 12 sentinel hospital laboratories in January 2000. The laboratories (six in the metropolitan area and six in Greater Minnesota) were selected to represent various geographic regions of the state. Sentinel sites report all cases of MRSA identified at their facilities and for the first six years of surveillance submitted all CA-MRSA isolates to MDH. The purpose of this surveillance is to determine demographic and clinical characteristics of CA-MRSA infections in Minnesota, to identify possible risk factors for CA-MRSA, and to identify the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and molecular subtypes of CA-MRSA isolates. A comparison of CA- and HA-MRSA using sentinel site surveillance data from 2000 demonstrated that CA- and HA-MRSA differ demographically and clinically, and that their respective isolates are microbiologically distinct.

In 2008, 3,605 cases of MRSA infection were reported by the 12 sentinel laboratories. Fifty-three percent of these cases were classified as CA-MRSA; 45% were classified as HA-MRSA; and 2% could not be classified. CA-MRSA infections increased from 131 cases (12% of all MRSA infections reported) in 2000 to 1,908 cases (53% of total MRSA infections reported) in 2008.

The CDC classifies MRSA isolates into pulsed-field types (PFTs) (currently USA100-1200) based on genetic relatedness. CA-MRSA isolates are most often classified as PFT USA300 or USA400. In Minnesota, the predominant CA-MRSA PFT has changed dramatically over time. In 2000, 63% of CA-MRSA isolates were USA400 and 4% were USA300. In 2006, only 10% of CA-MRSA isolates were USA400 and 78% were USA300. Because USA400 isolates are much more likely than USA300 isolates to demonstrate inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) on disk diffusion testing, the change in the predominant CA-MRSA PFT has also been associated with a decrease in the proportion of erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin-sensitive CA-MRSA isolates demonstrating ICR, from 93% in 2000 to 10% in 2006. A recently published article summarizes the first 6 years of surveillance (Como-Sabetti K, et al. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Trends in case and isolate characteristics from six years of prospective surveillance. Public Health Reports. 2009;124:427-435).

In 2007, MDH started collecting isolates from CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA invasive (isolated from a normally sterile body site) infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility and PFGE testing were performed on submitted isolates. Please refer to the MDH antibiogram for details. (see pp. 28-29).

In 2005, as part of the CDC EIP Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) system, MDH initiated population-based invasive MRSA surveillance in Ramsey County. In 2005, the incidence of invasive MRSA infection in Ramsey County was 19.8 per 100,000 population and was 19.4 and 18.5 in 2006 and 2007, respectively. In 2008, surveillance was expanded to include Hennepin County. The incidence rate for MRSA infection in Ramsey and Hennepin Counties was 19.9 per 100,000 (Ramsey 25.4/100,000 and Hennepin 17.4/100,000). MRSA was most frequently isolated from blood (77%), and 11% (36/325) of cases died. Eleven percent (36/325) of cases had no reported health care-associated risk factors in the year prior to infection.

Critical illnesses or deaths due to community-associated S. aureus infection (both methicillin-susceptible and-resistant) are reportable in Minnesota, as is vancomycin-intermediate and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus.

S. aureus that have developed resistance mechanisms to vancomycin are called vancomycin-intermediate (VISA) or vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA), as detected and defined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, formerly NCCLS) approved standards and recommendations (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration [MIC]=4-8 ug/ml for VISA and MIC≥16 ug/ml for VRSA).

Patients at risk for VISA and VRSA have several underlying health conditions such as diabetes, end-stage renal disease, previous infections with MRSA, recent hospitalizations, or recent exposure to vancomycin.

In 2008, 3 cases of VISA infection were reported to MDH. Prior to this, we had confirmed only 1 VISA case, in 2000. CDC first reported VISA in 1997, and since has reported approximately 100 U.S. cases. The 4 cases had history of diabetes, non-healing MRSA-positive leg ulcers, and end-stage renal disease requiring renal dialysis. The median age was 61 years, half were male, and two died. All had a history of vancomycin use, though the length of exposure varied from a few days to several weeks.

Nationally, CDC reported that most  VISA isolates were resistant to methicillin, susceptible to linezolid, and most had decreased susceptibility to daptomycin. VISA/VRSA infections are rare and reportable. If VISA/VRSA is detected, institute infection control precautions including contact precautions with use of gown/gloves for all room entries. Consult an infectious disease specialist regarding antimicrobial therapy. Infection control recommendations and laboratory detection guidelines are available at CDC's web site on VISA / VRSA: Vancomycin-Intermediate/Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Updated Thursday, 24-Jan-2019 08:37:43 CST