Hazardous Sites & Substances
- Hazardous Sites & Substances Home
- Hazardous Waste Sites
- Choose Safe Places Minnesota
- Environmental Exposures Grand Rounds
- Exposure and Health Investigations
- Contact us
- Drinking Water
- Fish Consumption Guidance
- Skin Lightening Products
- Water Contaminants and Your Health
- Special Well and Boring Construction Areas
- Wells and Borings
- MDH Guidance
- Air Quality by Topic
Environmental Health Division
Cancer and the Environment
This webpage is for people who are concerned about cancers that they have experienced themselves or in members of their family or community. The information is presented for the purpose of answering common questions about cancer risks and the environment, including a list of steps people can take to prevent or minimize cancer risks.
The term “environment” includes air, water, and soil, but also substances and conditions in the workplace and at home. It includes diet; the use of tobacco, alcohol or drugs; exposure to chemicals; and exposure to sunlight and other forms of radiation.
We all learn about risks at an early age—how to recognize them and how to avoid them. Some risks are obvious and immediate: proximity to hot stoves,use of chain saws, driving on the highway. But other risks (especially those associated with cancer) like tobacco use, and chemical and radiation exposures, are delayed in their effects and are often hard to understand.
What is Cancer?
The development of cancer is a multi-step process, starting with genetic changes in cells, followed by uncontrolled cell division and growth over time. The time from genetic change to the development of cancer, known as the “latency period,” is usually decades long,often 30 years or longer. This means that many cancers diagnosed today may be due to exposures causing genetic changes that occurred in cells a long time ago.
- A group of more than 100 different diseases.
- The uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells in the body.
Different types of cancer have differing rates of occurrence, causes, and chances for survival.
Cancer can develop in individuals of all ages, but is most commonly found in people who are older than 40 years. Nearly one half of all Minnesotans will develop cancer at some point in their lives. Because people are livinglonger, the chance of developing cancer is increasing.
Since cancer is not a single disease, it does not have a single cause. There are a variety of causes (better known as “risk factors”). These factors act over many years to increase an individual’s chance of developing cancer. They can include such things as age, race, gender, other genetic factors, exposure to tobacco, diet, physical inactivity, some viruses, radiation, medications, reproductive history and chemical exposures.
- Genetics play a role in most cancers. This means that a family history can be a risk factor for some types of cancers such as melanoma, prostate, breast and colon cancer. It is not unusual for several cases to occur within a family.
- Things we do in our daily lives can increase our chance of developing cancer. These factors, sometimes called “lifestyle factors,” include: cigarette smoking; heavy drinking; and having a diet that has excess calories, is high in fat, and contains few vegetables and fruits. Other lifestyle factors that increase risk have to do with reproductive patterns, sexual behavior, physical inactivity and excessive unprotected sunlight exposure.
- Cigarette smoking is a leading cause of cancer deaths in the U.S. today. In addition to being responsible for 80 to 90 percent of lung cancers, cigarette smoking is also associated with leukemia and cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, stomach, esophagus, pancreas, kidney, bladder, cervix, and endometrium(lining of the uterus).
Approximately 30 percent of all cancer deaths are related to smoking, and the risk of dying from lung cancer is 10 to 20 times higher for smokers compared to non-smokers.
Smoking is the most preventable cause of death in our society.
In the U.S.
From the 1930s until 1991, there was a steady rise in the overall cancer death rate in the U.S. The major cause of this rise was the increase in lung cancer; this was strongly associated with increasesin smoking. Death rates for many cancers—otherthan lung cancer—declined significantly between 1950 and 2008. These decreases are due to improvementsin the early detection and treatment of specific types of cancers,such as breast, colon, and cervical cancers. Even lung cancer rates for males have begun to decline since 1990. Between 1998 and 2008 the national cancer death rate fell 12.4 percent.
The incidence of cancer (new cases) is monitored by the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System. Created by the Minnesota Legislature in 1987, this statewide system collects information on all new cancers diagnosed in Minnesotans.
Minnesota’s cancer rates are similar to the national rates for most types of cancer. However, our lung cancer rates are lower compared to the U.S. population. This may be due to the fact that smoking prevalence in Minnesota was lower years ago. Today our smoking rate is similar to the national average and the gap between the national lung cancer rate and Minnesota’s rate is closing.
- In men, cancer incidence has declined in Minnesota since peaking in 1992, largely due to decreases in colorectal, stomach, prostate and lung cancer.
- In women, overall cancer incidence rates increased slightly, largely due to increasesin melanoma, kidney, thyroid and lung cancer, which outweighed decreasesin colorectal, stomach, ovarian and cervical cancer. Despite these increases, breast cancer deaths decreased due to earlier diagnosis and improved treatment.
- Racial differences have been observed In Minnesota, as in other parts of the country. American Indian men have the highest cancer rates in Minnesota followed by African Americans. Among American Indians, smoking- related cancers of the lung, larynx, and oral cavity, as well as prostate, colorectal and cervical cancers are unusually common.
Odds of Cancer in Minnesota Males
|Prostate||1 in 5||1 in 30|
|Lung||1 in 14||1 in 15|
|Colo-rectal||1 in 18||1 in 45|
|Bladder||1 in 22||1 in 111|
|Any Cancer||1 in 2||1 in 4|
Odds of Cancer in Minnesota Females
|Breast||2 in 15||1 in 34|
|Colo-rectal||1 in 19||1 in 50|
|Lung||1 in 16||1 in 19|
|Uterine||1 in 32||1 in 167|
|Any Cancer||8.5 in 20||1 in 5|
Many pediatric cancers occur early in life. Nearly 1 in 450 children will be diagnosed with cancer before the age of 15. Although some childhood cancers are associated with specific genetic and prenatal factors, in most cases the causes remain largely unknown.
It is believed that the organ systems of children are especially vulnerable to injury when undergoing periods of rapid growth and development. Factors that have been studied which play a role in childhood cancers include genetics, infectious diseases, prenatal conditions, environmental pollutants, and radiation. However, few studies have been able to show a consistent association between childhood cancer and these factors.
The types of cancer most often seen in children are different from those seen in adults.
The most common types of cancer in children:
- Tumors of the brain and nervous system
- Lymph node cancers
The most common types of cancer in adults:
- Prostate cancer
- Breast cancer
- Colo-rectal cancer
Chemicals in the Environment
The most significant risks of developing cancer come from lifestyle factors. However, exposures to certain chemicals in the environment, at home, and at work may contribute to an individual’s risk of developing cancer. Benzene, asbestos, vinyl chloride, radon, and arsenic are examples of toxic substances that can increase the risk of cancer to those who are exposed. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified these substances as “known human carcinogens.”
Some chemicals have been shown to cause cancer in animals, but there is not enough evidence to show that these chemicals cause cancer in humans. These chemicals are classified by IARC as “possible or probable (suspected) human carcinogens.”
Most of what we know about chemicals and cancer in humans comes from scientists’ observations of workers. Historically,the most significant exposures to cancer-causing chemicals have occurred in workplaces where large amounts of toxic chemicals were used. That is why safe work practices, personal protection, ventilation, and other controls are so important in protecting workers.
The amount of toxic chemicalsfound in food, air, soil, and drinking water are typically much lower than in the work environment. Therefore, cancer risk from environmental exposures is thought to be very low compared to the risk in occupational settings. In fact, the cancer risk from environmental exposures is so low that it is difficult to measure in scientific studies. It is not possible to determine the health of the environment by looking at cancer incidence or mortality in any given community. This is due to the many other significant factors (other than man-made pollutants) that determine a community’s cancer rates.
Scientists have compiled a list of substancesthat are either known or suspected of causing human cancer in The 14th Report on Carcinogens published in 2016. The report also describes where these substances are found in our environment.
There are several principles to keep in mind when you read an article or hear a news report about a new scientific study:
- A single study on the causes of cancer is seldom conclusive.
There are many examples where one study identifies a risk, but later studies do not confirm it. Scientists look for multiple studies with consistent results before drawing conclusions. Each new study that you hear or read about adds to the body of evidence that scientists use for understanding the causes of cancer.
- The dose determines the poison.
Scientific results are usually specific to a particular dose and route of exposure to a specific population being studied. Each individual’s chance of getting cancer from an exposure will be different depending on:
- The amount of contaminant to which a person is exposed
- The length of time a person is exposed
- The number of times a person is exposed
- How the person was exposed, such as by eating, breathing, or touching the substance
- Realize that uncertainties are always present in any study of environmental exposure and cancers.
Due to the long latency period of cancer development, it is often difficult to collect information regarding exposures years or decades after they occur. Individual genetic differences, age, gender, and health status interact with lifestyle habits, as well as environmental exposures -- causing some people to be more sensitive to developing cancer than others. Because it is difficult to account for all of these variables and how they interact, “uncertainties” exist in the study of cancer and environmentalrisk factors.
- “Safety factors” or “uncertainty factors” are used to set acceptable levels of exposure.
These factors take into account that certain individuals might be more sensitive to chemicals because of age (children and the elderly), genetic make-up, gender, diet, or health status. In addition, if mice or rats were used to test the chemical, the possibility is considered that people may be more sensitive to the cancer-causing effects of the substance than the rodents. To ensure that the acceptable level of exposure will protect the public, government agencies use safety factors that result in setting acceptable levels of exposure as much as 10,000 times lower than the levels used to observe cancers in mice and rats.
- Sometimes it is necessary to weigh risks vs. benefits.
Some drugs are prescribed even though they may increase the risk of cancers in later years. An example is the use of certain drugs to treat cancer that increase the risk of secondary cancers. In these situations, the immediate benefits of treating an often imminently life-threatening disease have been determined to outweigh the risks of developing another cancer several years later.
Strict federal and state standards have been set to minimize our exposures to cancer-causing chemicals.
- At the Federal level: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged by the U.S. Congress to set environmentalregulatory standards to protect human health and the health of the environmentfrom substances released into air, water or soil.
- In the State of Minnesota: the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) have state programs to meet or exceed the federal standards to protect human health and the health of the environment. Activities include monitoring of air, water, and soil; conducting scientific research,setting standards, proposing rules, and enforcement.
The MDH Division of Environmental Health protects people from environmental hazards in drinking water, the home, workplace, and community by:
- monitoring health trends,
- assessing environmental exposures in communities,
- evaluating the scientific evidence and recommending safe exposure levels or other actions to protect public health,
- establishing standards for chemicalsin air (called Health Risk Values) and water (called Health Risk Limits) specifying levelsthat are considered safe, and
- providing education about hazardous substances for communities and health professionals.
Many hazardous substances,such as certain pesticides and metals, continue to be found in our environment from past and current use. Dioxin, for example, is widespread and persistent in the environment. Small amounts of dioxin can be found in our food and in our bodies. It will take many years for such persistent chemicalsto break down or be removed from the environment.
Ironically, one of the most potent and well-known cancer-causing chemicals, tobacco, is still largely uncontrolled. There are over 40 known or suspected carcinogens present in tobacco smoke. Progress has been made, however, in controlling exposure to secondhand smoke in public buildings and on the job.
Some carcinogensin the environment occur naturally and are much more difficult to control. Arsenic in underground rock can get into drinking water wells. Radiation from the sun is also a strong skin cancercausing agent. Sometimes our own actions offer the best control for exposure. When necessary, we can purify drinking water or use clothing and sunscreen to protect ourselves from the sun.
Many other agencies work to protect the public from harmful environmental exposures. For a listing of some of these agencies, see Other Resources.
Cancer is a personal tragedy for those affected. But what may appear to be an “outbreak” of cancer does not, by itself, signal a special risk related to something in the environment. Unfortunately, cancer is common in our population. Nearly half of Minnesotans will be diagnosed with cancer in their lives. Seeing different types of cancer usually means there are different causes.
It is not unusual to observe many cases of cancer in a single community or neighborhood, particularly if the community is aging. In fact, using information from our cancer surveillance system, we know that cancers frequently occur in clusters. Clusters often occur by chance and cancer cases are not evenly distributed throughout the population.
At MDH, patterns of disease are investigated by epidemiologists who study the frequency, distribution, risk factors, and control of diseases in populations. Epidemiologistslook for an unusual pattern of a specific type of cancer, rather than several different types. They find out whether the specific type of cancer is a primary cancer or a cancer that is the result of metastasis (spread from another organ in the body).
Using statistical methods, epidemiologists can determine whether a reported excess of cancer in a population is really more than would normally be expected to occur. They must also take into account other characteristics of the population that can affect disease patterns,such as age, gender, and heredity.
Most of our knowledge about the causes of cancer in people comes from studying large populations. Even our best scientific methods cannot tell us the cause of cancer in an individual, or in a small group of individuals.
How to Reduce Cancer Risk
We can’t eliminate all risks in our lives. But we can, to a certain extent, manage them by adopting healthy lifestyles. MDH endorses the following American Cancer Society recommendations to prevent or minimize cancer risks:
- Stop smoking and avoid all tobacco products
- Avoid excessive exposure to sunlight
- Eat more fruits and vegetables, along with a low-fat, high-fiber diet
- Limit consumption of smoked and nitrate-cured foods
- Limit alcohol intake
- Maintain a healthy weight
- Exercise regularly
- Have routine physical exams since not all cancers have obvious symptoms
- Practice early detection—learn to practice self-exam and seek prompt medical attention for changes in your body which include:
- A thickening or lump in any part of your body
- An obvious change in a wart or mole
- A sore that does not heal
- A nagging cough or hoarseness
- A change in bowel or bladder habits
- Indigestion or difficulty swallowing
- Unexplained changes in weight
- Unusual bleeding or discharge
How Can I Protect Myself from Toxic Exposures in the Environment?
Your home provides your family with comfort and protection; but your home may also have hidden health hazards, such as lead, mold and moisture, carbon monoxide, pesticides, and hazardous household products. Many homes also have safety hazards that may cause physical injuries, fires, poisonings, and other emergencies. Creating a healthier home, whether in new construction or in existing housing, has obvious benefits to your family's health and well-being. See Healthy Homes Minnesota for more information and guidance on how to identify and reduce health hazards in your home.
On average Americans spend approximately 90 percent of their time indoors with the largest percentage of time spent within their homes. If you use chemicalsin the home, such as pesticides, paints, paint thinners, cleaning solvents, or preservatives, the following steps will decrease exposure:
- Read labels and follow directions carefully
- Use these chemicals only in a well-ventilated environment— outdoors when possible
- Throw away partially full containers of old or unneeded chemicals(following community guidelines for disposal of household hazardous waste)
- Make substitutionsfor less toxic substances whenever possible
- Have the basement of your home tested for radon. An estimated 1 out of 3 homes in Minnesota contain unhealthy levels of radon gas. Next to cigarettes, radon is the biggest risk factor for lung cancer. For a list of local city or county agenciesthat distribute radon information and test kits, see Radon in Homes or contact MDH at 1-800-798-9050 or 651-201-4601
- Your home may contain flooring, roofing, insulation or other products with asbestos — do not disturb or remove any asbestos containing material. For more information, see Asbestos or contact MDH at 651-201-4620.
Minnesota is blessed with abundant supplies of clean water, but in some areas there may be naturally occurring or manmade chemicals to which you could be exposed through your drinking water and some plumbing may be a source of contamination, especially from lead. For information about your source of drinking water (private well or public water supply), see Water Contaminants and Your Health.
If you have an older home (built before 1978), old paint may contain lead or other toxic metal. Peeling paint should be safely removed or covered.
- Be aware of any carcinogenic substances used in your workplace
- Participate in work hazard communication training programs
- Read labels and take precautions as directed
- Use recommended personal protective equipment
- Stay informed. If you have concerns regarding pollutants in your community, contact the agencies responsible for safeguarding our environment and our health, such as MPCA and MDH, Division of Environmental Health. A number of polluted workplace sites have been listed and cleaned due to reports from the public.
- Members of tribal communities may contact their Natural Resource Management or Environmental Health departments.
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the largest cancer research organization in the country; supports research at universities, hospitals, foundations, and businesses throughout the U.S. and abroad.
The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) was established to reduce human illness caused by unhealthy substances in the environment.Activities include biomedical research, prevention, and intervention programs along with training, education, and community outreach efforts.
- National Toxicology Program (NTP): Coordinates toxicology research and testing activities within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(DHHS). Publishes a biennial Report on Carcinogens.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is an agency of the U.S. DHHS that is charged with promoting health and quality of life by controlling disease, injury, and disability:
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) is an agency of the U.S. DHHS that advisesthe EPA on hazardous waste issues. ATSDR has educational fact sheets about toxic chemicals.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the World Health Organization (WHO) and has a mission to coordinate and conduct research on the causes of human cancer.
The American Cancer Society is the nationwide, community-based, voluntary health organization dedicated to eliminating cancer as a major health problem by preventing cancer, saving lives, and diminishing suffering from cancer, through research, education, advocacy, and service.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is an agency of the U.S. Department of Labor charged with preventing work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is an agency of the CDC that researches and makes recommendationsto prevent work-related disease and injury.